From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 08:35:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5242B50E; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263BC2200; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1E643B99; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 03:35:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53E88035.4050301@marino.st> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:35:01 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , Andrej Zverev , John Marino Subject: Re: svn commit: r364581 - in head/www: . p5-Dancer-Plugin-Lexicon References: <53e7f525.2d6d.2af7441e@svn.freebsd.org> <53E8547B.5020703@marino.st> <53E86495.9020002@marino.st> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:35:37 -0000 On 8/11/2014 10:11, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 11 août 2014 08:37:09 +0200 John Marino wrote: > | On 8/11/2014 08:23, Andrej Zverev wrote: > |> as usual ;) i'll fix it for you. > | > | What does that mean? I don't like the implication. > | > | Do you want me to assign you all the patch-ready Perl5 [new port] PRs? > > What you should do is assing all perl5 related PRs to perl@ if their > MAINTAINER is not a committer. We will know how things work better than > you. that sounds fine to me. * PRs submitted by committers should be manipulated by the committer (Since the auto-assign is *STILL* busted, please people, don't let the people doing triage make these assignments that you have the capability to do. It's not considerate.) * That means the remaining perl PRs are submitted by non-committers, so the next step after triage will be to assign to perl@ unconditionally. That makes things easier for sure. John