From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 23:17:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB20B7EF; Mon, 11 May 2015 23:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [66.135.54.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B745B1B22; Mon, 11 May 2015 23:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D510D56085; Mon, 11 May 2015 18:17:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 18:17:38 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Bryan Drewery , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r386075 - in head: devel/p5-AnyEvent-DBus devel/p5-App-Control devel/p5-C-Scan devel/p5-CPAN-YACSmoke devel/p5-Cdk devel/p5-Config-Record devel/p5-ConfigReader devel/p5-Data-Hierarchy d... Message-ID: <20150511231738.GA3492@lonesome.com> References: <201505111204.t4BC4JYg015040@svn.freebsd.org> <5550B685.30901@FreeBSD.org> <20150511144500.GA11717@lonesome.com> <26D5606B76674F99199A7AAA@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26D5606B76674F99199A7AAA@ogg.in.absolight.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 23:17:41 -0000 On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:56:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > I just added a couple dozen ports to perl@, there are already 2k+ there, > it's not changing any number in a significant manner. Well, I'm grumbling a bit, I know. But I would like it to be explicit: - can only members of the perl@ team commit to perl@ ports? - if so, are we asserting a single team can effectively maintain > 2000 ports? If the latter, I am very skeptical. mcl