From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 2 15: 1:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6CD37B401 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:01:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13507.mail.yahoo.com (web13507.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A61143EBE for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:01:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dyeske@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20021202230135.85509.qmail@web13507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.197.166.118] by web13507.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:01:35 PST Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:01:35 -0800 (PST) From: David Yeske Subject: Re: cvs -rbranch:date + val-tags To: Archie Cobbs Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200212022139.gB2LdbXH047742@arch20m.dellroad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am still looking into the -j flag and (r)tag. This patch was done quickly, and I am still trying to see what it breaks. I realized some of the issues I had were also broken with an unpatched cvs. So I might have broken something that is already broken. I am looking through diff -rv1_11_2 -rHEAD in the FreeBSD repository and diff -rCVS1_11_2 -rHEAD in the NetBSD repository and comparing that with -rHEAD cvs/ccvs from the cvshome repository. I don't know what the CVS people think of my patch, but I based it off a patch on their website that they have had for over 4 years. http://www.cvshome.org/cyclic/cvs/dev-branch.html I would really appreciate it if anyone would give me feedback on what they feel is "broken" about cvs. --- Archie Cobbs wrote: > David Yeske wrote: > > I am working on getting cvs more usable so I don't have to worry about > > val-tags when I have read only media, and so I can do stuff like this. > > > > cvs update -rRELENG_4:2002/10/01 > > > > cvs diff -rRELENG_4:2002/09/01 -rRELENG_4:2002/09/30 > > > > I would appreciate any testing or feedback. I have tested this some, > > but it probably has bugs. > > Awesome! I've wanted to be able to do tags like '-rRELENG_4:2002/09/01' > for years.. > > Haven't tested your changes but the patch looks reasonable to me. > > ISTR that the '-j' option allows some combinations of branch + date. > Are you aware of that? Does anything need to be rectified between > the '-j' stuff and your changes? Also, what do the CVS people think > of your patch? > > Cheers, > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message