From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 12 09:49:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1158E16A40D for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB4C43D48 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.33.193]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1FeUGh-0008FX-0A; Fri, 12 May 2006 13:49:07 +0400 Message-ID: <44645A12.3040207@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:49:06 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Boris Samorodov References: <20060509004620.3a8ed7a1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060512035553.GB27663@soaustin.net> <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:49:23 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2006 22:55:53 -0500 Mark Linimon wrote: > >> I'll also remind folks that if they want to see a list of maintainer-update >> PRs, they can use http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsprsmaintainerupdates.py. >> Currently there seem to be 55 PRs on that list. > > How is this list created? Does the script look at "class" of the PR? > I have a PR with "take maintainership" suggestion and class > "maintainer-update". But my PR is not listed: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/97076 But you wrong here. maintainer-update means "Update from Maintainer" but you're not yet. So the right class would be change-request. BTW, quite often maintainers set class not as maintainer-update. -- Sem.