From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 11 09:24:02 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5A71937B401; Sun, 11 May 2003 09:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (beastie.mckusick.com [209.31.233.184])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DC6AA43FE0; Sun, 11 May 2003 09:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.mckusick.com (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h4BGNxTh035306;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 09:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Message-Id: <200305111624.h4BGNxTh035306@beastie.mckusick.com>
To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 May 2003 16:17:08 PDT."
             <20030510161623.C5056@znfgre.qbhto.arg> 
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:23:59 -0700
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: bin/51619 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 16:24:02 -0000

	Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
	From: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org>
	To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>
	cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
	Subject: Re: bin/51619 
	X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match

	On Fri, 9 May 2003, Kirk McKusick wrote:

	> I would say you have a winning fix. I am happy to have it go in.

	I tested this lightly, and it doesn't seem to do any harm. :)  Kirk, you
	should probably commit it, but I'm happy to do so if you're too busy. I
	think this is a critical thing to fix before 5.1-Release.

	Doug

	-- 

	    This .signature sanitized for your protection

It is your fix, you should commit it. You should note that it
was reviewed by me. And of course, you will need the approval
of release engineering at this point.

	Kirk