From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 18 11:30:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF81065690 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0738FC41 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7IBU9L7056087 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7IBU9JA056084; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:09 GMT Message-Id: <200908181130.n7IBU9JA056084@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Boris Samorodov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137865: [patch] sysutils/heartbeat: correct dealing with cases, where are two or more (virtual) interfaces with an IP-address, but only one is up X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Boris Samorodov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:30:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/137865; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Boris Samorodov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, michael.leun@arcor.net Cc: Subject: Re: ports/137865: [patch] sysutils/heartbeat: correct dealing with cases, where are two or more (virtual) interfaces with an IP-address, but only one is up Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:08:43 +0400 The port sysutils/heartbeat has been updated to version 2.1.4 for two weeks now. Does this problem still exist and is the patch correct? Thanks! -- WBR, bsam