From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 1 11:53:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from itouch.co.nz (itouch.co.nz [203.99.66.188]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AD037B71A; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:53:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@itouch.co.nz) Received: (from jonc@localhost) by itouch.co.nz (8.11.2/8.11.1) id f21Jr6b07342; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:53:06 +1300 (NZDT) (envelope-from jonc) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:53:06 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Jimmy Olgeni Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Eterm 0.9.1 and the backspace key Message-ID: <20010302085306.A7089@itouchnz.itouch> References: <20010301162438.B90190@itouchnz.itouch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from olgeni@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 01:24:28PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: > > > Could we please have a: > > > > --with-backspace=bs > > > > in the CONFIGURE_ARGS for Eterm 0.9.1? The default makes the backspace > > key generate a DEL, which wasn't the same behaviour as 0.8.x. This keeps > > it the behaviour the same as xterm as well. > > Sure. Somebody already asked for something similar: I'll make it > behave like 0.8. Thanks! > Btw, is the 0.9.1 tarball already out? I'm still at 0.9. Oops. Misread the FAQ! :-) -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Opportunity does not knock, it presents itself when you beat down the door" - W.E. Channing To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message