From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Sep 20 21:20:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ice.cream.org (ice.cream.org [195.8.71.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1E537B424 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 21:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28456 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2000 04:19:56 -0000 Received: from ice.cream.org (HELO cream.org) (195.8.71.30) by ice.cream.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2000 04:19:56 -0000 Content-Length: 616 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200009210305.UAA03694@freeway.dcfinc.com> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 05:19:58 +0100 (BST) From: Andrew Boothman To: "Chad R. Larson" Subject: Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r Cc: jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, nbm@mithrandr.moria.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@FreeBSD.ORG, seb@bluetail.com, ruslan@shevchenko.kiev.ua, olgeni@uli.it, kris@FreeBSD.ORG, (Mikhail Teterin) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 21-Sep-00 Chad R. Larson wrote: >> =* If you are the MAINTAINER of a piece of code (or more likely a port) >> =and don't have commit privs, put "MAINTAINER update" in the synopsis, >> =for the same reasons as before. > I too am a bit worried. Are we saying that one of the ports > committers doesn't expect to do that job unless certain keywords > are in the PR? If so, that should be documented other than in > e-mail here. Not really, see Kris Kennaway's reply. I will write this up for the Handbook once we've decided on the wording though. --- Andrew Boothman http://sour.cream.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message