From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 16 13:06:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5115116A412 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5313C469 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k27so2376155nfc for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:06:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ZtJtPO3zDDTDmrsh9cVKVQSO3trZE6gmIffaT019wxAuBl3eLUUSGXyKDQf/skS809XmVt2Wq/2tWpuOQxAPc8qEVoanh4ClGSfvsyc24uV2UCGfX2FVhA4E47PEFXnvGNVkF/iMPBTAHtHsgToHgW4TMi79tXWuNaTskEhP2FM= Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr1074217bue.1168952767660; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.164.20 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:06:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:06:07 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Joel Dahl" In-Reply-To: <1168948802.1333.23.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1168562996.1100.42.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se> <1168948802.1333.23.camel@jesus.automatvapen.se> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6f88495ad2db0cf1 Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [UPDATE] RFC: The end of the contributors article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:06:10 -0000 On 1/16/07, Joel Dahl wrote: > 7. Comments, suggestions & feedback much appreciated. First of all, a big thanks to you! a. I would go with either or than . We sometimes use the latter syntax, but it's neither correct nor very beautiful. Considering all the e-mail addresses are already available for harvesting, displaying their complete forms everywhere would only be helpful for copy-paste purposes. b. I wonder if you plan to move out the rest of the stuff from the contributors article. I for one would appreciate it very much, I often have to go there to look up names and/or e-mail addresses. Thank you Joel!