From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 10 21:52:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA23102 for current-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MindBender.HeadCandy.com (root@[199.238.225.168]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA22975; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.HeadCandy.com (michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1]) by MindBender.HeadCandy.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA05982; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606110449.VAA05982@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> X-Authentication-Warning: MindBender.HeadCandy.com: Host michaelv@localhost.HeadCandy.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Terry Lambert cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm), phk@freebsd.org, nathan@netrail.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does freebsd support SMP? In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 10 Jun 96 12:15:53 -0700. <199606101915.MAA04084@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 21:49:36 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Re: the NCPU vs. MAXCPU ... the reason I made a distinction is that >you may not want all available CPU's active (I can only think of >testing as wanting this, but it could happen). Maybe you'd want to reserve one of them for a game of Descent... ;-) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... Roll your own Internet access -- Seattle People's Internet cooperative. If you're in the Seattle area, ask me how. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------