From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 14 00:47:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E277D50B for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56812FBA for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (ppp121-45-246-96.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.246.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9E0lewd058846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:47:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <525B3F33.4030103@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:47:47 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened to nslookup? References: <0E.82.01315.25778525@cdptpa-oedge03> <20131011221302.GH1611@albert.catwhisker.org> <54.9B.16944.480B8525@cdptpa-oedge02> <20131012022825.GJ1611@albert.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20131012022825.GJ1611@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 00:47:44 -0000 On 10/12/13 10:28 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:14:28AM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> ... >> Thanks for info! > Glad to help. > >> I saw that bind was removed from the current branch because of security problems, > It was removed, but I believe that there was a bit more to it than > "security problems." I think it was just a personal preference that managed to get communicated as "important", and no-one had the energy or will to argue about it. (that's the way software projects often work.. loudest and most persistent voice wins). >> but didn't know nslookup was part of BIND. >> >> Now I see in $PORTSDIR/dns/bind-tools/pkg-plist >> >> bin/dig >> bin/host >> bin/nslookup >> >> so host is also part of BIND? > :-} The version of host we had when BIND was part of base was part of > BIND, yes. Looking in src/usr.bin/host/Makefile, I see: > > # $FreeBSD: head/usr.bin/host/Makefile 255949 2013-09-30 17:23:45Z des $ > > LDNSDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../contrib/ldns > LDNSHOSTDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../contrib/ldns-host > ... > > which indicates that this is a re-implementation of "host" as > provided by contrib/ldns. > >> I will remember to use "host" in the future. > I have found it generally easy to use (easier by far than nslookup). > > Peace, > david