From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 22:46:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1119216A46D for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E646013C448 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn01.u.washington.edu (hymn01.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.55]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.05) with ESMTP id l56MkHbU014360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:46:17 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn01.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l56MkH4P001622; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:46:17 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.3] by hymn01.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:46:17 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:46:17 -0700 (PDT) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: Jack Vogel In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0706061217v69eddd10t85b73f8ea1f049a1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.6.6.152833 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Plan to MFC new em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:46:18 -0000 On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 6/6/07, Jack Vogel wrote: >> I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT >> is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back. >> >> I wanted a chance for any concerns to be aired before I did it, issues >> that anyone has had with the driver in CURRENT? > > I think it would be a good idea to have some testing done before > the MFC, so I will try and get a driver tarball put together shortly > and post that here, I would appreciate any volunteers that could > install and 'kick the tires' a bit :) > > Jack CC me and I'll give it a shot on 7-CURRENT and 6.2-STABLE. I have both setup on virtual machines with vmware. -Garrett