From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 12 01:49:41 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id B2B69963; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:49:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:49:41 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r313841 - head/comms/openobex
Message-ID: <20130312014941.GC92762@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201303102105.r2AL5C2o048218@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20130311013156.GA73813@FreeBSD.org>
 <1814448.jXEQ24LmKk@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk>
 <513E5682.1070704@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <513E5682.1070704@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 01:49:41 -0000

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:11:14PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >>Would it be feasible to make DOXYGEN default for bulk pacakge building
> >>cases but not for regular port users (that is, hide it behind BATCH or
> >>PACKAGE_BUILDING)?
> 
> I do like your idea.
> 
> I have tested the port with the following stanza after OPTIONS_DEFINE:
> 
> .if !defined(BATCH) && !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
> OPTIONS_DEFAULT+=      DOXYGEN
> .endif
> 
> It does work as expected, is this what you had in mind?

Yes, exactly.

> Should I check only against one of the two variables?

Not sure; better ask someone who's closer to package builder cluster? :)

./danfe