From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  7 23:01:42 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D833A16A468
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net
	[69.17.117.10])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39A313C457
	for <cvs-all@freebsd.org>; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 23:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: (qmail 13396 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2008 23:01:42 -0000
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO aldan-mlp) ([216.254.65.224])
	(envelope-sender <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>)
	by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <pav@freebsd.org>; 7 Feb 2008 23:01:42 -0000
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc.
To: pav@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:01:36 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <200802070531.m175VikU015939@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200802071738.20992.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
	<1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1202424131.80678.21.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802071801.38477.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org>,
	cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: obsoleteing PORTREVISION bumps (Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/icu)
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:01:43 -0000

=DE=C5=D4=D7=C5=D2 07 =CC=C0=D4=C9=CA 2008 05:42 =D0=CF, Pav Lucistnik =F7=
=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9:
> > Why can't the package-building infrastructure put the
> > two-and-two together and figure out, that the dependent ports need
> > rebuilding /without/ explicit PORTREVISION bump?
>
> Where are the patches?

Pav, this is insincere. As a portmgr member you know, that I have, in fact,=
=20
contributed patches. Some of them are even in the bsd.port.mk. With that=20
aside, let's continue...

The package-building is in capable hands, I'm sure -- actual patches=20
(implementation) is not the problem. I'm pointing at a /design/ flaw.=20
Pointing it out should be sufficient.

Best,

 -mi