From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 2 01:54:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9D16A41F for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C254243D60 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.146.189] (port=46494 helo=smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq3.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EX7pR-0006El-Ox for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:54:17 +0100 Received: from cp464173-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.215.228]:50641 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EX7pP-0005p5-10 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:54:15 +0100 From: Danny Pansters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 02:52:21 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20051102012740.56CCB43D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051102012740.56CCB43D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> X-Face: :N, f2_*44g[tRY8Y-gL2zi`G|<6SpFjTeHt|V5LO6Yl2E7yAfEh{E6-8pqxUFX"l)=?utf-8?q?Nm8y=7E=0A=09IWJSAWQ=7D+=3DpP=7CT=5D?=@sy1sz%h)*CW6gtbp]"fe@MjICtIUo.0, CH~{[R4PXSyL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511020252.21646.danny@ricin.com> X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: New Logo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:54:21 -0000 On Wednesday 2 November 2005 01:27, Steve Bertrand wrote: > -- snip -- > > > That's correct, but we should recall that this is a mailing > > list to ask technical questions, not discuss logos or flame > > people. Discuss logos on the advocacy@ list; don't flame > > people on any list. > > I don't post here often, You should have left it at that. The discussion is present now and open at -questions and if you want it to end quickly, have it be discussed and end there. Stonewalling is always counterproductive. It started at -questions and it will end at -questions. This is not flames, this is discussion (largely sollicited also). Let people discuss what they want to discuss and suck up the result. One person's flame is one other person's insightful comment. It's out there. Deal with it. If you don't feel qualified, don't interfere (that surely doesnt have anything to do with a logo generally). My opinion, Dan