From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 17:02:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43F116A4D1 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (hak.cnd.mcgill.ca [132.216.11.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B43643D62 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:02:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3804kK0093639; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:04:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id i3804jlb093638; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 20:04:45 -0400 From: Mathew Kanner To: Luigi Rizzo Message-ID: <20040408000445.GC83704@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <20040407172853.GS64506@arved.at> <20040407104630.B13115@xorpc.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040407104630.B13115@xorpc.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: I speak for myself, operating in Montreal, CANADA X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.62 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.62 (2004-01-11) on hak.cnd.mcgill.ca cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org cc: Tilman Linneweh Subject: Re: soundcard.h and POSIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:02:50 -0000 On Apr 07, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 07:28:53PM +0200, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am currently fighting with a port, that wants to compile with XOPEN_SOURCE > > defined, which does not work with our sys/soundcard.h > > I wonder, why our soundcard.h uses the u_ types. > > because it is *very very old* ! Is this something we can change or do we have to keep the status quo? --Mat -- In general, a standard is very useful, whether it's de facto or du jour. - Microsoft's Greg Sullivan as misquoted by News.Com