From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 24 07:50:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128B6106566B
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 07:50:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57B018FC0C
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 23950 invoked from network); 24 May 2012 07:43:21 -0000
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33)
	by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 24 May 2012 07:43:21 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:43:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <20120524.094321.74735847.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: rizzo@iet.unipi.it
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <20120524071055.GA50710@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <20120524071055.GA50710@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: use of non-contiguous masks in address lookups ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:50:05 -0000

> every now and then the issue comes up on whether we still need
> to support non-contiguous masks in address lookups.
> I seem to remember someone (perhaps on this list) making a
> case for their presence, but forgot the details.
> So, does anyone know of a practical use of non contiguous masks ?

I vote for removing non-contiguous masks. They are incompatible with
CIDR, which was introduced in 1993 (!).

Non-contiguous masks have been unsupported in many routers produced
the last 10 years or so.

E.g. for Juniper M/MX/T routers you specify an interface address with
a contiguous mask (1.2.3.4/29 etc). It is *not possible* to specify a
non-contiguous mask. Address lookup is always based on longest prefix
match.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no