From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jul 4 1:40: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C778B37B5E0 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id BAA51058; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007040840.BAA51058@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Reply-To: Brad Knowles Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/19635; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Brad Knowles To: Will Andrews , clefevre@citeweb.net Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:11:06 +0200 At 9:21 PM -0400 2000/7/3, Will Andrews wrote: > Does anyone else here think this is a good idea? If you're looking for votes, you've got mine. BTW, will this play nicely with -h? Consider me stupid if you like, but I've recently been re-re-re-re-reading the man pages for df(1), and ran across this option I had never heard of before, and I quite like the way it adaptively summarizes the information. Of course, now that you've got me started, I have to go re-re-re-re-read the du(1) man page, too. ;-) Thanks! -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message