From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 19 01:23:03 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEDA106566B;
	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net
	(exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780AA8FC17;
	Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from philip.hq.rws (174.79.184.239) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net
	(207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0;
	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:23:02 -0800
Message-ID: <4B550975.8090800@p6m7g8.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:01 +0000
From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Organization: P6M7G8 Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
References: <4B54D17E.8000508@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B54D17E.8000508@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why change to plist-sub for pkg-message?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:23:03 -0000

Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
> 
> I've noticed a lot of commits recently to use plist-sub for pkg-message
> and I'm wondering if there is some overarching purpose for this, or if
> it's just general cleanup? If the latter that's fine, and I am fully
> supportive of efforts to keep things neat and tidy. The reason I ask is
> that I was recently sent the following PR, I don't see any benefit to
> the proposed change, and the user hasn't responded to my followup request.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142847
> 
> 
> Any insight would be welcome,

That particular one is questionable, but I'm sure if every post-install 
message is in pkg-message or files/pkg-message.in it will help with


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/122877

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer,                        FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant,                       P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin,                 Ridecharge Inc.

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.