From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 18 09:06:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E6D1065670 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:06:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B668FC14 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from meatwad.mouf.net (cpe-024-162-230-236.nc.res.rr.com [24.162.230.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1I96ERU064225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:06:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4F3F6A06.2080206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:06:14 -0500 From: Steve Wills User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.org References: <4F3DD93E.1090206@FreeBSD.org> <20120216205102.9f590d60.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4F3E541D.8060104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F3E541D.8060104@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mouf.net [204.109.58.86]); Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:06:15 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: ruby 1.8.7p358 and ruby 1.9.0p125 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:06:19 -0000 On 02/17/12 08:20, Steve Wills wrote: > On 02/16/12 23:51, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:36:14 -0500 >> Steve Wills mentioned: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> If anyone is interested in trying the updated ruby 1.8.7p358 or ruby >>> 1.9.3p125 which were both released today, I have a patch here: >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165223 >>> >>> Builds fine and passes tests, and as you can see in the PR, there is an >>> exp-run requested for it, but extra testing won't hurt. >>> >> >> Which tests? >> >> Does it pass the rubyspec regression test suite? Did you look at possible >> regression in rubyspec compared to the previous release? >> > > Just the tests that are run by "make test" in the build dir after > building is done. If there's a better way, let me know. > For the record, I finally found these tests and ran them. I had to set sysctl kern.chroot_allow_open_directories=2 to get past the chroot errors, which cleared up a lot of the initial huge batch of failures. Then I ended up with this for 1.9.3p125: 3483 files, 18247 examples, 153913 expectations, 0 failures, 37 errors as compared to the results for 1.9.3p0: 3483 files, 18231 examples, 154206 expectations, 0 failures, 37 errors So I think it seems OK. Haven't looked at 1.8.7p358 yet, but it's a much smaller change set so I'm much less worried about it. Steve