From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 30 21:13:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA05193 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 21:13:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA05183 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 21:13:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA19481; Sun, 30 Nov 1997 21:13:04 -0800 (PST) To: Jacques Vidrine cc: Alex , "hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Out of Box experience (Was: Re: How is selection made of what goes into CDrom?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 30 Nov 1997 22:48:09 CST." Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 21:13:04 -0800 Message-ID: <19477.880953184@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > ... I _am_ saying that software with such licenses should not be used in > the implementation of FreeBSD itself or essential FreeBSD utilities, such > as sysinstall. Why carry such luggage? What? Eh? I wasn't talking about doing anything of the sort in FreeBSD. Sysinstall in Qt certainly isn't on *my* todo list and I doubt that it ever would be unless somebody suddenly decided that they wanted to pay me $100,000 to do it or something :-). I was simply reacting to your implication (cited below) that KDE shouldn't use it. Jordan > > Jacques Vidrine > > > > Only KDE depends upon Qt, which doesn't have an appropriate software > > > license.