From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 23 16:15: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4788E37B401 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from zircon.seattle.wa.us (dsl231-043-165.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6575943FB1 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:14:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joe@zircon.seattle.wa.us) Received: (qmail 31758 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 00:14:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 00:14:56 -0000 Subject: Re: Posix semaphore problem From: Joe Kelsey To: Mikhail Kruk Cc: Gregory Bond , Hongbo Li , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1048464896.20622.28.camel@zircon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 23 Mar 2003 16:14:56 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 16:06, Mikhail Kruk wrote: > I beleive he is not using SYS V Semaphors but rahter POSIX semaphors. I > don't know about 5.0, but they are definitely not supported in 4.x Posix semaphores in 5.0 are supported with a kludged-together mess of SYSV semaphores and posix-threads... The 5.0 implementation of posix semaphores is seriously broken. /Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message