From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 20:42:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0BD1065675 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1ea]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308208FC1C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id 7E5D67BCB1; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:42:21 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:42:21 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <33122B07-5473-4C84-A89D-B4C2F9677BC0@lassitu.de> References: To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Limiting disk I/O by jail or uid? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:42:22 -0000 Am 21.11.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Adam Vande More: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote: >=20 > Interesting, but it doesn't seem to offer limiting the I/O bandwidth = induced by a process or jail, or assigning different priorities, which = would need to be implemented in the ZFS or GEOM schedulers, I suppose. >=20 > Limiting CPU has long been the poor man's IO scheduler, and has = usually worked pretty well for me but has required some trial and error. = YMMV=20 Good point, I'll give that a try. Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811