From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 22 03:03:56 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA01798 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 03:03:56 -0800 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA01785 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 03:03:53 -0800 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id DAA14050; Wed, 22 Mar 1995 03:03:28 -0800 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 03:03:28 -0800 Message-Id: <199503221103.DAA14050@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: chaos@rivers.oscs.montana.edu CC: ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Jason Boerner on Wed, 22 Mar 1995 03:04:43 -0700 (MST)) Subject: Re: Fixed xpm ports... I think... From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * xpm has been through a version upgrade to 3.4e * Everything seems to work. Since I am completely new to this stuff I am * sure that I am doing something risky and nieve but hey. I can now * play with some of the X stuff :-)... I tried it myself, it seems to be working fine. Haven't tested it too much but the old version isn't available on the master ftp site so there isn't much point in having the old one lying around anyway. * Am I reporting this correctly? Why thanks, that's excellent. I just updated the ports stuff on our main repository. Unfortunately, our compile server is down so the package may take a little longer. Satoshi