From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Feb 25 14: 9: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B9637B491; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:09:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1PM8WH74360; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:08:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: sobomax@freebsd.org Cc: rooneg@electricjellyfish.net, ports@freebsd.org, jhk@freebsd.org, gad@freebsd.org, reg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] which package functionality for pkg_info In-Reply-To: <200102252125.f1PLPH132145@vic.sabbo.net> References: <20010225161633.C94657@electricjellyfish.net> <200102252125.f1PLPH132145@vic.sabbo.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010225140831G.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 14:08:31 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 14 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Sobolev Subject: Re: [patch] which package functionality for pkg_info Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:25:17 +0200 (EET) > Identation-wise it should be OK if so. If you haven't yet, pleae read > style(9) manpage to get an idea of how your code should be formatter. While true, another rule takes precedence here, which is to format changes to existing code in the same style as that code, even if it's not style(9) compliant. To do otherwise results in code which is a confusing mish-mash of differing styles and harder to read than code which is simply self-consistent. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message