From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 02:02:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72F16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4298443D39 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:02:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=Gerard.rcn.com) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CjTAw-0003pE-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:02:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:02:54 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: X-X-Sender: beerstud@spamcop.net@mail.cesmail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: CPUTYPE directive options in /etc/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerard Seibert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:02:59 -0000 In regards to using the 'CPUTYPE=' directive in the '/etc/make.conf' file, would it be advisable to use the CPU type; i.e., p2 for instance rather than i686. This is assuming that the processor is detected by FreeBSD as an Intel PII, i686 as an example. Is there an advantage to using the 'p?' designation over the numeric (i686) designation? Thanks! Gerard Seibert gerard-seibert@rcn.com An architect's most useful tools are an eraser at the drafting board, and a wrecking bar at the site - Frank Lloyd Wright