From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 15 11:22:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA27138 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:22:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from heaven.gigo.com (ppp.gigo.com [207.173.132.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA27133 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:22:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) From: jfesler@gigo.com Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [207.173.133.57]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A32CA144C; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:22:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:22:04 -0800 (PST) To: Roger Marquis Cc: Bill Fumerola , Jesse , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for Apache: Add FreeBSD Server Layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Then too there's the matter of compatibility with other Unix operating > systems. Why reinvent the wheel when Solaris has been doing this right > for half a decade already? Gentlemen, this is a religious issue. heir() is the bsd way, /opt is the Solaris way. People love and hate one versus the other. It's a fact of life. Can I at least get you guys to agree to disagree, and see each other's points? Nothing's going to *change* and in the end, we all use the ports to our advantage to save time, but yes, they do often need customizing to fit the needs/personalities of a given site. Anything more, is back to religious debate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message