From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Jan 15 5:22:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (unknown [198.79.110.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4D037B699 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 05:22:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA03133; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 05:21:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200101151321.FAA03133@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 05:21:23 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: bin/24271: dumpon should check its argument more To: sam@inf.enst.fr Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <2001-01-15-12-14-48+trackit+sam@inf.enst.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 15 Jan, Samuel Tardieu wrote: > On 13/01, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > | This patch introduces at least eleven new style bugs. > > I'm not a commiter, and doesn't even know what you are talking about > (new style?). Do you have a pointer onto this "new style"? > I'm not answering for Garrett, but I took his meaning to be that the command line arguments introduced would create "new style bugs" there. That is to say, the order, use and interdependencies can be measured with introducing new command line arguments. I believe there is a formula for determining this, although I'm not familiar with it. So his number should be fairly accurate about that. BTW, I'm not a committer either. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message