From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 04:59:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3816A417 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from spork.qfe3.net (spork.qfe3.net [212.13.207.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203F613C45E for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom.hurst@clara.net) Received: from [81.104.144.87] (helo=voi.aagh.net) by spork.qfe3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IMG3K-0001uq-Tz; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:36:46 +0100 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IMG3K-000Pbh-KM; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:36:46 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 05:36:46 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20070818043646.GA96661@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ivan Voras , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <84373.93412.qm@web34511.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20070817154139.GA1089@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: Thomas Hurst Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gjournal reporting 1/2 the speed of non journaled? What is the status of Gjournal? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 04:59:39 -0000 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Ivan Voras (ivoras@fer.hr) wrote: > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >=20 > > We have ZFS now, we don't need journaled file system:) >=20 > I hope development on other file systems on FreeBSD won't stop because > of ZFS :) Choice is always good Quite. Personally I'm quite looking forward to Bluffs: http://asiabsdcon.org/papers//P11-slides.pdf Perhaps not as much as ZFS, but a more conservative option is always good. --=20 Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/ --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGxndeNBBHZ542MwQRArDeAJ95oeoqJ9C5EZf6pUQ9/EWJ2w2vWgCcCLz6 A+h4g6MgKs5AHzKk5euEJNk= =TGuz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--