From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:48:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C324516A4CE; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C2443D58; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23Gk7M5010692; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:46:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:46:30 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20050303.094630.46868412.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ryans@gamersimpact.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <42271B6A.4070802@gamersimpact.com> References: <20050303074242.GA14699@VARK.MIT.EDU> <42271B6A.4070802@gamersimpact.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: das@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing kernel thread stack swapping X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:48:12 -0000 In message: <42271B6A.4070802@gamersimpact.com> Ryan Sommers writes: : Of course it : could be argued that embedded systems probably don't have many threads, : many threads that can be swapped, or even swap space in the first place. You'd be wrong about the 'embedded systems don't have many threads' part of your statement. Our embedded and semiembedded systems tend to have dozens of the goofy thing. However, you'd be right about the 'no swap space' part. We run without swap. Warner