From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 28 15:46:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from vortex.wa4phy.net (pcp01578012pcs.martnz01.ga.comcast.net [68.47.4.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E032237B41C; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from vortex.wa4phy.net (localhost.wa4phy.net [127.0.0.1]) by vortex.wa4phy.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2SNkPO99651; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:46:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sam@wa4phy.net) Message-ID: <3CA3AB51.FCD22E3A@vortex.wa4phy.net> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:46:25 -0500 From: Sam Organization: You Gotta Be Kiddin! X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Cc: Nate Williams , Terry Lambert , Matthew Whelan , Gregory Neil Shapiro , Robert L Sowders , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The sendmail discussion... References: <20020328152840.Q87366-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Folks, I hate to be snotty, but gosh, I don't think this thread really belongs in a discussion about -stable. Bad enough that the sendmail created so many "me too's" but wouldn't -chat be a better place for california laws? Sam -- Just because you're moving fast | BURMA SHAVE doesn't mean that you're really | going anwhere at all! | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message