From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 24 20:46: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from corp.au.triax.com (slwag1p14.ozemail.com.au [203.108.157.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C8014CCA for ; Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:45:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@corp.au.triax.com) Received: (from jim@localhost) by corp.au.triax.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA78682; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:45:30 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:45:29 +1100 From: Jim Mock To: Rob Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fetch -A(?) Message-ID: <19990325154529.A76127@corp.au.triax.com> Reply-To: jim@corp.au.triax.com References: <19990324234014.A66989@stratos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.1i In-Reply-To: <19990324234014.A66989@stratos.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 at 23:40:14 +0000, Rob wrote: > Hi, > Just wondering -- has anybody tried to keep up to date with the > ports tree under 3.1? It seems that the ports collection has this > problem where /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk uses a command called > `fetch -A'. But, `fetch -A' doesn't work on a default 3.1 system -- > at least not the RELEASE I downloaded :) > > So, is there some sort of configeration value I have to set, or > should I grab an updated fetch? Editing that file and eliminating > `-A' is kind of a pain. > Go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ and install the 3.1 upgrade kit. That'll fix it. -- Jim Mock System Administrator jim@corp.au.triax.com ,-._|\ FreeBSD work: Triax Internet Services http://www.triax.com/ / \ The personal: http://www.triax.com/~jim/ \_,--._/ Power To The FreeBSD 'zine http://www.freebsdzine.org/ v Serve! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message