From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 18:04:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792116A41F for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322C543D48 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7GI4rY3025766; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:04:53 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j7GI4r5a025764; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:04:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:04:53 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Heikki Orsila Message-ID: <20050816180453.GB19325@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050816132001.GY31158@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WhfpMioaduB5tiZL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050816132001.GY31158@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deprecate archivers/undms-1.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:04:54 -0000 --WhfpMioaduB5tiZL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:20:01PM +0300, Heikki Orsila wrote: > Hello, I noticed that archivers/undms lacks licensing terms and is not=20 > maintained anymore. xdms is however maintained (by me) and has clear=20 > licensing terms. Both tools do the same thing, though I suspect xdms is= =20 > more complete. >=20 > I ask you to deprecate undms and remove it from the ports collection=20 > after a while. Given the complete lack of license statement and the fact that there is replacement functionality, we should probably just nuke it and remove the distfile from our FTP sites. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --WhfpMioaduB5tiZL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDAirDXY6L6fI4GtQRAo/lAKCOlSLV7AdFFHKgHpg6+KYNV8kvbACfYzkK M/XzbxcxgFsiKws4D1wL98U= =3Jxr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WhfpMioaduB5tiZL--