From owner-freebsd-security Wed Sep 15 16: 0: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (SMTP1.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BA915005 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 15:59:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu) Received: from unix13.andrew.cmu.edu (UNIX13.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.15.17]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA10968; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:59:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:59:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Harry M. Leitzell" X-Sender: Harry_M_Leitzell@unix13.andrew.cmu.edu To: Brett Glass Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990915164546.048d0100@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the list have a huge arguement over this a while back and the decision was to leave it in for some reasons that someone dreamed up? Anyone who didn't see the issue brought up, might want to check the list logs (Wherever they might be) for 3.2 or another release. On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Was doing some testing on the latest release candidate of FreeBSD 3.3, and > noted that the Berkeley Packet Filter was enabled in the GENERIC kernel. Is > this a good idea? > > --Brett Glass > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > [-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-] Harry M. Leitzell - Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu Carnegie Mellon University Finger for PGP Public Key [-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message