From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 11 18:51:09 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEAF296
 for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:51:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org)
Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org
 [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a9c4::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB328A7
 for <gnome@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:51:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by redundancy.redundancy.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 91D9F2FC347; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:51:08 -0700
From: David Thiel <lx@freebsd.org>
To: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: shotwell
Message-ID: <20130311185107.GB91604@redundancy.redundancy.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13
X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg
X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/<p]y9X%E+4%:1wo-M!re,
 zl.qH~yzbL-MWhtp$3QuKP&di/a{FOctD[FuX.\n4U*,
 M{TJg$oYp663.NyX!%H~~Tw$eR9xZU5W?1BM#t"a@'27^2x
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
 <freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:51:09 -0000

Hello gnome,

I currently maintain the shotwell port, but don't really have the 
resources to keep it up to date right now. I think it should probably 
belong to gnome@ anyway, as it depends on a lot of gnome stuff being up 
to date, like vala. Any objection to me changing the maintainership to 
you guys?

Thanks,
David