From owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Fri Oct 16 13:19:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C8AA16B5B for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:19:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from clavin2.langille.org (clavin2.langille.org [199.233.228.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "clavin.langille.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056F8117F; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from (clavin2.int.langille.org (clavin2.int.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) with ESMTPSA id D62A58F90 ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\)) Subject: Re: Measuring ZFS configuration differences From: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:19:39 -0400 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8B37FEDC-218A-4071-8CB7-48361BB72B1D@langille.org> To: Marcelo Araujo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094) X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 13:19:48 -0000 > On Oct 16, 2015, at 5:15 AM, Marcelo Araujo = wrote: >=20 > 2015-10-13 1:00 GMT+08:00 Dan Langille : >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Any suggestions? >>=20 >>=20 > A list of "what we want to test" would be helpful. Maybe we can add it = at > the same wiki page? > Also, would be nice assign each test to someone that wants to perform = it. > As an example, I have my lab where I can make benchmarks in parallel = with > your lab, if we assign tasks we won't have duplicated tests(in case we > don't want it). >=20 > I will update soon the information about my LAB. I think these are all fine ideas. Running the same tests in more than one environment is good. If our = results can be reproduced, it means our methods and conclusions are valid. =E2=80=94=20 Dan Langille http://langille.org/