From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Sep 22 7: 4:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BAF37B422 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA17531; Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:04:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 10:04:50 -0400 From: Michael Lucas To: Lorenzo Allegrucci Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Urban legend? (was: Just imagine..) Message-ID: <20000922100450.A17515@blackhelicopters.org> References: <3.0.1.32.20000922153528.008dbd20@pop.tiscalinet.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.20000922153528.008dbd20@pop.tiscalinet.it>; from lenstra@tiscalinet.it on Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:35:28PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Somewhat. Early betas of Win2k identified themselves as "NetBSD" in OS fingerprinting tests. However, that's what the BSD license is for. If MS take *more* of our IP stack, a lot of pain and misery would be alleviated for a lot of people. On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote: > > Is it true that m$ included the TCP/IP stack of FreeBSD in w2k? > If so m$ has already "embraced & extended" unix :-( > > -- > Lorenzo > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message -- Michael Lucas mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message