From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 21:46:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C7A16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:46:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECC643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:46:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 65so266143wri for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nGQOzkLzlC4Aa4Z62L78wxW0ndTrFnts4p631LveO2IsWsf+gb1Zj3AO1c1IgbSMygQl4mNVkfDzuNQlBG+UCmdxeQmaY1BNmwKDpzyDlzewPjGo3D74KS8ZbvZFSzxxoSTyLW+75NKGu4lCP9i8FGuj9JlhbNIc83PsO+IWAbY= Received: by 10.38.181.44 with SMTP id d44mr518476rnf; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.20 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <755cb9fc04102614461e0d7c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:46:53 +0100 From: Alexandre Vieira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Compiling PF and IPFW in the same kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexandre Vieira List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:46:54 -0000 Hello, Anyone knows if there is any problem in compiling ipfw and pf in the same kernel? Which one will be turned of by default? Or will they both be turned on? Will the default rule for PF be allow all ? Sorry for the mass questioning! thanks for your time :)