From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 06:30:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B36B16A417; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from skapet.datadok.no (cl-426.sto-01.se.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:1a9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0CD13C45A; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@bsdly.net) Received: from thingy.bsdly.net ([10.168.103.11] helo=thingy.datadok.no.bsdly.net ident=peter) by skapet.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IKTRq-0003QV-U9; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:30:42 +0200 To: Daniel Gerzo References: <3962.206.248.190.92.1186944927.squirrel@mail.vmstat.org> <46BF6809.2000406@FreeBSD.org> <1270.206.248.190.92.1186953629.squirrel@mail.vmstat.org> <224945138.20070813003105@rulez.sk> From: peter@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:30:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <224945138.20070813003105@rulez.sk> (Daniel Gerzo's message of "Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:31:05 +0200") Message-ID: <873ayorlo1.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Alec Subject: Re: email address on http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:30:45 -0000 Daniel Gerzo writes: > Actually, there is almost nothing you can do about it. I would > recommed you to install and properly configure spam filters and > maybe to implement graylisting if you have problems with spam. In my book, greylisting is not a maybe if you want a sane mail environment. Unfortunately there's a lot of uninformed comment floating around, the fact is that the few wrinkles that need to be worked around (large outgoing server farms, incompetently run mail services) are easy to work around, and it ends up saving you time and power. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.