From owner-freebsd-net Tue Aug 28 10:59:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A7E37B40A for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7SHxh439282; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:59:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:59:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200108281759.f7SHxh439282@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Brooks Davis Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Runt frames = broken VLAN ? In-Reply-To: <20010828103536.D10481@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010828010515.0221d380@192.168.0.12> <200108281654.f7SGsIF38299@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010828103536.D10481@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > But doesn't the switch have to assume that the VLAN will be attached to > some non-trunked ports, in which case the packets must be an appropriate > length. The minimum length needs to be enforced at the output interface. (A switch would need to do so anyway for locally-generated packets.) -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message