From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Feb 13 11:22:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA02144 for multimedia-outgoing; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA02133 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA14235; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:22:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702131922.LAA14235@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Randall Hopper cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good results with Wincast/TVdbx In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Feb 1997 07:38:04 EST." <19970213073804.09333@ct.picker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 11:22:11 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of Randall Hopper : > Amancio Hasty: > |I forgot to mentioned that the driver does not wash windows nor does it > |control the weather 8) > > What!? But I thought.... Aawwhh, Nuts. ;-) > > |> And color conversion + a capturecard-videocard single DMA transfe r > |> per frame would be a real peach. The '95 Wincast TV program does > |> this I believe (great framerate, no artifacts, and low CPU!). > | > | Nope the Win95 client , does capturing okay, it does retry > | very well 8) And the output to the display is slow slow and slow. > | the capture utility probably just uses the cap class to grab > | the frame then uses GDI or DIB both are slow . > | > | Your frame rate will go way up once you get a decent or > | well supported vga card for sure you will leave Win95 in the dust. > | Well, at least thats the case over here . > | > | Bettina: Why is the video display so slow? > | Amancio: Sorry babe, I am running Win95 . 8) > | Bettina: Oh, Okay it is much faster on FreeBSD... > > I believe you misunderstood me. I'm no Win95 fan (quite the I am not a Win95 fan and I don't mind comparing two different implementations which I did in my case thats all. It appears that Hauppauge has implemented the "overlay" capability in their driver. "overlay" in this case is direct dma transfer . Intel got lazy and didn't implement this feature in their driver actually they only implemented yuv9 and rgb24. Have fun, Amancio