From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 17:36:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867171065677 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8F88FC1D for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-100-145.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.100.145]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A8351A7C; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:36:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id m8EHahF9001651; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:36:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:36:43 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa Message-Id: <20080914193643.1bb1f822.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <48CCDC26.7020802@pukruppa.net> References: <48CC8BBD.4050306@pukruppa.net> <48CCDC26.7020802@pukruppa.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: How to test an unsupported scanner (CanoScan LiDe 90)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:36:46 -0000 Hi! Seems that the CanoScan LiDe 90 is one of the scanners built by Canon that are not supported well. That's a reason to avoid them. :-) I had similar issues with a LiDE 45 (I think it was), and I did soon replace it with a SCSI scanner that worked out of the box without problems. On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:40:54 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: > > I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane > > (CanoScan LiDe 90). Mayve the SANE team will get this scanner to work later on. But at this point in time, the scanner will be outdated. :-) > In the meantime I have played around a little bit: > I put vendor and product id's into > /usr/src/sys/dev/usb/uscanner.c and usbdevs and rebuilt > my kernel. > So now I get > # dmesg | grep uscanner > uscanner0: addr 2> on uhub1 > which changes: > # sane-find-scanner -q > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9, product=0x1900) at > /dev/uscanner0 > Also I tried an appropriate entry in > /usr/local/etc/sane/genesys.conf > but the result of > # scanimage -L > remains the same (not identified) and > # scanimage -d genesys:/dev/uscanner0 > image.pnm > scanimage: open of device genesys:/dev/uscanner0 failed: > Invalid argument This indicates that this scanner works differently than those usually supported by the genesys backend. I "love" Canon for making things complicated exactly this way. Maybe this scanner is compatible to another driver, but that's only a guess. Maybe it's not compatible to anything that exists. -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...