From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 24 19:39:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5A116A404; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C017A13C4E7; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (p54A7E18A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.167.225.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B74540548E; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:11:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47C1C161.10107@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:11:29 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <20080221173150.GA93693@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080222070728.GA56282@team.vega.ru> <20080222091642.GB57428@team.vega.ru> <864pc1s1wa.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080222105239.GC94607@team.vega.ru> <86abltqjiz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080222124617.GA16580@team.vega.ru> <86wsoxp2ob.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080223201808.GB65540@team.vega.ru> <20080224180433.GA21162@dragon.NUXI.org> <20080224190637.GB18096@team.vega.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080224190637.GB18096@team.vega.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav , Kai Wang , Joseph Koshy Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:39:24 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:04:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:18:08PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> now bootstrap BSD ar on systems >700044, and that we call >>> GNU ar/ranlib with the "g" prefix instead of "gnu-". >> Why are you going against my preferences for "gnu-" - if I liked "g" >> I would have done it that way in my patch. >> > The reasoning for the "g" prefix sounded sane to me. > Anyway, I don't want to argue about this point, and > will leave it to you to decide (I've reverted to the > "gnu-" prefix). I'd prefer the g-prefix. It's commonly used, just thing gmake, gawk and similar stuff.