From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 18:50:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2349C16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF30D43D55 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:50:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (11e01205903fdae8791fa3750922baf3@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3F1nW8G011328; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F40552322; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:50:42 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040415015042.GA59112@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <407C4035.8020609@ciam.ru> <1081896823.772.58.camel@klotz.local> <20040414131949.3A56E43D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <20040414232927.GA56961@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040415011809.GA58644@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD Current cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Second "RFC" on pkg-data idea for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:50:45 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 6:18 PM -0700 4/14/04, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 14, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > > > > My hope is that if I get far enough along into the pkg-data > > > project, the result would be that many of the common operations > > > would be faster. However, right now I can only say "that is one > > > of my goals", and I can't prove it would actually happen... > > > >There's only a few things that execute external commands in the > >common code path of port makefiles. I've been working hard to > >remove or limit them, and as I mentioned above it's possible to > >optimize the current framework a lot further without too much > >hard work. >=20 > Hmm. Well, if the pkg-data ideas did not actually speed things > up (as I hope they will), then that would eliminate one of the > main reasons that I have been interested in investigating them. > I do still suspect pkg-data would be faster, but maybe it won't > be as much of a difference as I am hoping it will be. I wouldn't want to bet the farm without seeing it in action, i.e. this isn't a selling point unless you can show it to be true. Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAfepxWry0BWjoQKURAqxOAKDf7KyVpsYNpi2b3+tGOJxLuVeBTACfYVwI cZwCUvJdcxXWXR9qCtK2Brg= =0lPp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--