From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 14 00:34:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA20916A4DA for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jsunx1@bellsouth.net) Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461843D6B for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jsunx1@bellsouth.net) Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([68.221.117.79]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060714003433.MGNR27777.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:34:33 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.221.117.79]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060714003433.BIO17714.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@localhost> for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:34:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:38:29 -0400 From: J To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060714003829.GA27743@brokedownpalace> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060714014823.c4d0b759.nick@nickwithers.com> <000f01c6a6ba$6d1d4340$0a10a8c0@holgerdanske.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000f01c6a6ba$6d1d4340$0a10a8c0@holgerdanske.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: 6.1-RELEASE-i386 man broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:34:40 -0000 On 2006-07-13 (Thu) 13:25:04 [+0000], David Christensen wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Please read what I wrote more carefully. To summarize: don't set > > $MANPATH in your environment, and the man(1) command will work > > correctly. > > Now I understand: > > > The environment variable MANPATH should in general not be set, as > > that will override the effects of /etc/manpath.config. > I ran into and had to solve this problem myself when first coming to FreeBSD, recently, as my transported Linux bash configs contained MANPATH=$MANPATH:/custom/manpath. What I never figured out was the rationale for this. Anyone mind me asking what's wrong with MANPATH or why manpath.config is exclusively favored? For instance, while I have a /usr/lib/man.conf on my Linux system and can set the default manpath there, man happily coexists with any MANPATH. How does one add a custom manpath without root privileges? Etc. Just curious; thanks.