From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:32:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D93ED7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893E2186 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp-2.int.fusionio.com ([216.51.42.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0MGWIPW073427 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:32:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <50FEBF0C.6050307@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:32:12 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eggert, Lars" Subject: Re: Data Center Bridging? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:32:35 -0000 On 1/22/13 8:43 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Hi, > > on Linux, various NICs (e.g., ixgbe) support Data Center Bridging. Is this also available under FreeBSD? Do *any* NICs support DCB under FreeBSD? > > Thanks, > Lars > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > that really depends on what you want to do given a freebsd command line and a kernel with the right options I could probably bridge two networks in about 15 minutes. (I have done it in the past). if DCB is a specific protocol then we may need to do some work to support it. as I've not heard of it.