From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 16 07:33:36 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6A91065670
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2008 07:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from EXHUB015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net
	(exhub015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.96])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42B8FC15
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 May 2008 07:33:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com)
Received: from smgellar.p6m7g8.net (70.88.236.22) by
	smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server
	(TLS) id 8.1.263.0; Fri, 16 May 2008 00:33:36 -0700
Message-ID: <482D38CE.705@p6m7g8.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 03:33:34 -0400
From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Organization: RideCharge Inc
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080506)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
References: <482D3481.3050107@p6m7g8.com>
In-Reply-To: <482D3481.3050107@p6m7g8.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: mounts: nullfs and unionfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 07:33:36 -0000

Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> FWIW: the unionfs seems very stable atm the moment.
$ df -h
Filesystem                      Size    Used   Avail Capacity  Mounted 
/dev/ar0s1h                      24G     12G     11G    52%    /usr/home
<below>:/usr/home/jails/base     49G     36G     11G    77% 
/usr/home/jails/net/p6m7g8/builder/zeus

Shouldn't the size for the unionfs fs be the same ? I don't see how it 
can be bigger than the HD.

In this particular case, its a RAID-1 (hardware based) of 2x20GB disks.



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com)
o:703.549.2050x206
Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc.
http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.