From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jan 7 16:22:55 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA01570 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 16:22:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA01565 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 1999 16:22:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id BAA95072; Fri, 8 Jan 1999 01:22:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: FreeBSD-chat Subject: Re: New Majordomo Feature References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Jan 1999 01:22:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: "Jason C. Wells"'s message of "Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:20:42 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jason C. Wells" writes: > The new command would be "spamthread". Anyone who is a subscriber could > issue it by sending a reply to Majordomo. Majordomo would read the command > in the body and then look at the subject header. Majordomo would shunt all > spamthread messages with the offending subject to /dev/null or perhaps a > queue for evaluation, banishment, or nuclear assault. It would be a very efficient means of killing off a discussion you're starting to lose, or a thread where your work is being criticized. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message