From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Tue Aug 26 13:44:34 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-multimedia>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA06710
          for multimedia-outgoing; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 13:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA06693
          for <multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 13:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id VAA00253; Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:30:04 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199708261930.VAA00253@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: Re: Which driver?
To: CSP1DWD@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU (Denis DeLaRoca)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 21:30:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: hasty@RAH.STAR-GATE.COM, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199708261949.MAA03298@hub.freebsd.org> from "Denis DeLaRoca" at Aug 26, 97 12:48:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> For FreeBSD 2.2.x, would it suffice to apply those patches to
> 2.2.x's isa.c to compile guspnp18 successfully?

i'd say yes, unless amancio has done dramatic changes in interfaces to
the rest of the system, guspnp10 had no problem in compiling on 2.2

	Luigi