From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 25 14:57:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F6610656E1 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-12.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-12.bluehost.com [69.89.18.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 951DB8FC14 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 25597 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jul 2009 14:57:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by outboundproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jul 2009 14:57:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=gKu/LJ08yU0fZbMFfhjaSmA8SRCGnYwRGExUe7I/K32GdvCLXM7hzfW8E6h+WJSCRXSLKv2DmubIzpIR79F+kZiO1TQ2WxSQiV83Zuh4jwlB+VINbfKXiWa4AjiHzGnT; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MUigK-00080K-So for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:57:05 -0600 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:50:15 -0600 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:50:15 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090725145015.GB31190@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1221.69.49.38.10.1248525974.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1221.69.49.38.10.1248525974.squirrel@webmail.ibctech.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: A question for developers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:57:06 -0000 --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:46:14AM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: >=20 > In years gone by, I've toyed with both Emacs and vi. I'm no stranger to > using CNTL functions frequently (ee), but I've always felt more at home > with vi. I just never put in the initial effort to make it stick. I'm > going to give vim a go. It's what I've been contemplating for quite some > time anyway, and the recent post brought it to the surface. Good luck! --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Sean Reifschneider: "If java had real garbage-collection, it would delete most programs before it executed them." --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkprG6cACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWtyACeNl2TtFyDyoewMrCCw7vc5B0j +vsAoK3C9JVJF6Bfe1IIrI4mDCYXJiH1 =TAwi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip--